One review = one editor
Every broker review is signed. The editor who opened the account, placed the orders, read the contracts. No collective signatures, no pseudonyms.
No. 04 · Team
Three editors who have covered online brokers since 2021. No algorithms. We publish what we have tested. Every review is signed by the editor who ran the test, with their name, their contact address and the number of reviews to their name. If you dispute a score, you know who to write to.
No. 01
Senior Writer · European Markets & Regulation
Before comparing a broker, you always look at the entity behind it and its licence. The rest is marketing.
View profile
No. 02
Research Analyst · Fees, Data, Transparency
A broker is judged on verifiable figures, not on marketing promises. The rest is spin.
View profile
No. 03
Editor-in-Chief · UK Markets & FCA Regulation
A good broker review is measured by what it spares you, not by what it sells you.
View profile
01 Our charter
Every broker review is signed. The editor who opened the account, placed the orders, read the contracts. No collective signatures, no pseudonyms.
The editor stands behind their score. If a reader disputes it with arguments, the editor responds directly (and revises it if necessary). The score is not an anonymous aggregate.
The commercial team (which manages affiliate partnerships) cannot request a change to a score or preferential placement. Contracts are signed at the standard rate, regardless of the score.
If an editor has a personal interest in a broker (a long-standing account, a former employer), it is disclosed at the foot of the review. Transparency is the only safeguard.